In order to yield more rent or attract good tenants, it is imperative as a property owner to meet certain standards of safety, cleanliness and livability.

As with most rental agreements, tenants are normally expected to avoid doing any modifications to an apartment, flat or home without asking for the landlord’s permission. Usually, in lower rental properties, a compromise is reached between home owner and the renter when repairs or any alteration is deemed necessary. It is the property owner who typically provides the materials like paint.

If you’re someone renting, your risk is that the moment you work on a repair in exchange for a reduction in rent, you have entered into an agreement. You should think about what could happen when, for example, you fall off a ladder or when you damage the property. Most probably, personal injury insurance is out of the question and the cost of this damage is usually deducted from your deposit when the time comes for you to move out.

If you’re a landlord, the tenant could be considered as an employee because it can simply be construed that the work was for payment. If something were to happen to the tenant while doing these repairs, the property owner, in return, could be considered as an employer and would then be responsible for shouldering the tenant’s medical bills.  Moreover, it would be problematic to deduct damage costs from the deposit because the work was completed under contract, although it was agreed upon verbally.

If the homeowner and occupant want to enter into any agreement to do work for rent, the terms of their contract should be in writing and signed by both parties.

If you’re renting and you’d like to improve your housing and at the same time save on rent, talk to your landlord and prepare a clear scope of work along with a contract. Painting, adding wall attachments or building an outdoor deck may not present much of a legal problem, however, it would be smart to clarify this with your landlord – he or she will most likely not mind. Keep in mind that this is a temporary living arrangement and that you don’t want to go overboard with renovating your house or apartment only to be enjoyed by the owner and the next tenant.

Most lease agreements require you to move out before the deposit is returned. To ensure you get your deposit back, consider services like bond cleaning Melbourne. When your landlord sees how spotless your rental is, he or she will have no qualms about giving the deposit back.

Your lease is a legal agreement that is founded on your state laws and it is binding in a court of law. If something about the terms of the agreement is not clear, talk to your landlord and clarify before entering into an agreement.


acropolis-2725918_960_720The very first Athenian politician to emerge out of a typical background was Themistocles. His dad’s name was Neokles along with his mum’s Avrotonon, which seems very similar to the impartial names given to hetaeres  from the closed Athenian society. It’s said that Themistocles attended college in the Kynosargos area, in which the children of mixed marriages, believed nearly untrue, were educated.

Athenian Political Strategy

Even the Persian wars united all Athenians, no matter the private quarrels and political gaps, in a common front that won the last success and altered the course of history. The entire involvement of those at the point was that which brought an end to the remaining vestiges of the Athenian aristocracy.

The Athenian political strategy took on its final shape beneath the Republic, once the town started to be dominated by archons originating from and chosen by the public. Afterward, everybody had the exact same chance to rule whether the lot dropped. If last year’s soldier had been competent, he would grow to be this year’s overall. This involvement in public matters supposed the taxpayers acquired energy and private experience by serving in various capacities.

It also supposed the growth of the sound decision necessary to select future officials, to create judicial decisions, and also to chart the length of their nation.

In the initial laws of Solon, that left the Skythian philosopher Anacharsis wonder how it managed for the Greeks to collect awareness by listening to wise guys and in precisely the exact same time to allow the dumb to judge, as much as Pericles who informed the Athenians about the advantages of democracy, over a century of development and adaptation needed elapsed.

Considering that all of the streets were available on sea and land making Athens a college for all of Greece and inducing the Athenians to learn how to enjoy what is amazing, to philosophize, to reside at a comfy but not unmanly manner, and also to be prepared to die to their homeland if needed.


Social media is not limited to just marketing your product or service.  Today, politicians utilize social media to gain advantage over their opponents. “Politicking,” commonly known as political marketing, is a practice around the globe that political candidates use to influence people in voting for them during election period. It helps put the candidate in a desirable light like how traditional marketing does in showcasing a particular product or service.

Political marketing provides candidates their own platform to show the public where they stand on particular issues. It gives political parties insights on public needs and wants and ultimately earn people’s trust, putting them in a more positive light, avoiding risks that can taint the image of a candidate.

It is neither easy nor cheap. It requires a lot of time for research. With the proper tools (Instagram Audit, for example, is a great tool that analyzes user behavior on social media), a marketer will be able to accomplish the following:

Identify the politician’s stance on certain issues. It will show what areas need improvement. If the politician does not have a good public image in relation to a certain issue, a new strategy needs to be employed.

Identify a successful approach. Much like in advertising, there are many ways to showcase your product to the market. For a politician, a live forum could be more effective than a television. Visiting the city leaves a better impression than handing out flyers. Social media could also get them votes from the younger generations.

Identify what the masses want. Oftentimes, people do not really know what they want until it’s introduced to them. This is the same when it comes to political marketing. To the public’s eye, position A is the best option, until another politician comes along and convinces them that position B is the best way to go.

Considering these points, it is safe to say that politicking has a lot of influence in people’s decision making. It may seem that you’re taking advantage, but it is definitely an effective way for politicians to reach their goal.

Social Media can also make a political candidate look good by making the people fall in love with the candidate. Their social profiles can show their good side to the public through strategic posting of photos and captions.

Hiring a smart, creative political marketer is the key to success. A smart marketer will help you achieve your goal without doing the same repetitive things the public is accustomed with.


Regulation is likely to create results from all search engines standardized, decreasing the volume of competition and further stifling innovation.

Before, you start with an editorial, there has been much disagreement regarding whether or not the government should provide some sort of regulation on search motors. An article points out that when Google stated that they were a just informational resource, providing an objective opinion of the most relevant sites of the web. Over time, nevertheless, Google’s enterprises have enlarged enormously, with maps, shopping, paid email advertisements and litanies of auxiliary endeavors. Google now has a reason to market their services above their competitors, and it is a conflict of interest when, apparently, you’re managing a target site, while industry expansion is obviously a fantastic thing.

Most of us probably think of search engines as tools that we use on daily basis, but the fact of the matter is the search engines are a booming company, and the market is being dominated by Google having almost two-thirds of all searches.

How can the federal government decide if search results are”fair”?

If search engines, like https://bing.com, have to disclose their proprietary calculations, it’ll be easier for people to manipulate the system. Ordinarily, businesses like Google would be forced to deliver a better service than their competitors, including as for example Yahoo! and Bing. However, since Google could be the defacto search engine for virtually everyone else and has a huge market share, there’s little pressure out of the competition that could force any of their practices to change.

With the arcane nature of online regulation, when the government ever does do it will probably be years off. In the meantime, it’s important to use discretion when searching doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the ideal and to realize that Google and other search engines are not a celestial authority.

Legislation prohibits experimentation and competition, which consequently prohibits innovation and growth. Google happens to be under analysis in Europe for violating antitrust regulations, and the company expects a similar question from the united states following their purchase of ITA, a flight advice computer software firm. You might be asking yourself on what reasons that the government will have the ability to regulate other search engines and Google. The solution is simple: the internet market is driven by Google. Being ranked highly in Google’s organic listings means dollars for organizations, therefore it can mean substantial financial losses if Google unfairly ranks their own material or other companies.

Clearly, the process for any law is how exactly to do it professionally and fairly, which is particularly challenging when working with all proprietary advice as an algorithm and also the vastness of the internet.


How frequently, in the past few decades, has the news agitated and made you feel anxious about where America is going? Whether you read news online via https://bing.com, watch it on the television or read the daily paper, do you ask yourself, are these politicians serving you, or they appear to be only serving their private political agendas and self-interests?  What makes the electorate continue to vote, in accordance with their prejudices and biases, empty promises of celebrities over than individuals with experience, expertise, exhibited judgment, and a degree of intellect, that offer viable, appropriate, sustainable options?

Isn’t it, about time we prioritized the greater good, defending America’s liberties and dignity?

The right to vote.

The Presidential election of 2016 when Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but Donald Trump emerged victorious in the Electoral College – we find that more Americans decided to not take good advantage of their responsibility to vote. Today, we see many citizens expressing their disappointment towards President Trump, but were not these folks who did not vote one of the main causes? Mr. Trump won the election for a wide variety of motivations, and I believe, some of those primary ones, comprised: a) many did not like Hillary Clinton, b) voters believed his empty promises even though he didn’t give the public a clear plan or solution for the nation’s problems, c) they shared Trump’s vision of the US, as well as his biases and prejudices.

Respect for the man sitting in the office is different from respect for the man himself.

We should honor the office of the President as the highest in the nation, however, there is a fine line between ignorantly following the leader, especially when his actions does not respect the ideals, freedoms, and liberties of this nation. Unless citizens of the United States choose their officials responsibly, they will only see rights being abused in the future. Everything will remain the same until voters realize enough is enough.